Page 75

Libroplantasingl

74-75 a shared line sorting plant Increase compared to average month Table 12 Month Increase compared to average month (light weight packaging) Month Increase compared to average month (solid urban waste) January -1.27% January -8.37% February -11.98% February -6.06% March -10.10% March -12.32% April -5.90% April -0.37% May 3.48% May 0.01% June -0.71% June 5.20% July 8.56% July 5.64% August 12.71% August 7.51% September -4.00% September 5.13% October 9.68% October -0.76% November 0.02% November 2.45% December -7.55% December -6.91% Average month 0.00% Average month 0.00% Nominal capacity light weight packaging Nominal capacity (t/h) = inputs at the end of the service life (t/year) / (1 shift * 1,729 h/year) 3,585 t/year / (1 shifts * 1,729 h) = 2.1 t/h. The sorting plant must have a nominal capacity of 2.1 t/h. Design capacity light weight packaging Inputs year 10 = 3,585 t/year. Average monthly input = 3.585 t/year / 12 months = 298.7 t/month. Most unfavourable month input (August) = 298.7 t/month * (100% + 12.7%) = 336.7 t/month. Useful hours/month = 1,729 h / 12 months = 144 h/month. Design capacity = 1.1*(mean monthly input and end of service life (t/month) * Input increase in one month (%) / (1 shift * 144 h/month)). 1.1*(336.7 t/month / (1 shift * 144 h/month)) = 2.6 t/h = 3 t/h With a design capacity of 3 t/h the facility can ensure treatment of light weight packaging input throughout its service life. The design capacity of the facility must be 35 t/h when processing the solid urban waste fraction and at least 3 t/h when processing the light weight packaging fraction. LIGHT WEIGHT PACKAGING SORTING PLANTS


Libroplantasingl
To see the actual publication please follow the link above